GEO&BIO • 2023, vol. 24, pp. 173–182

https://doi.org/10.53452/gb2412

Cite as

Harbar, O., V. Moroz, D. Harbar, L. Voronchuk, N. Danylovska. 2023. The structure of earthworm communities in urbanised biotopes of the Central Polissia. Geo&Bio, 24: 173–182. [In Ukrainian, with English summary]

The structure of earthworm communities in urbanised biotopes of the Central Polissia

[Структура угрупувань дощових червів в урбані­зованих біотопах Центрального Полісся]

Oleksandr Harbar1, orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4357-4525

Viktoriia Moroz1, orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1676-5182

Diana Harbar1, orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5739-3114

Lyubov Voronchuk2, orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-1753-6242

Nadia Danylovska2, orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-1293-4938

1 Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University (Zhytomyr, Ukraine)

2 Cherniakhiv Lyceum No. 1 (Chernyakhiv, Ukraine)

pdf:   pdf

Abstract

The article describes the results of the impact of urbanisation on the quantitative and qualitative structure of earthworm communities, since urbanisation is currently one of the main threats to biodiversity. Earthworms, as the most common representatives of the edaphic mesofauna, react sensitively to the level of environmental pollution. On the example of the city of Cherniakhiv, it has been established that the lumbricide fauna of the studied area includes eight species: Aporrectodea caliginosa (Savigny, 1826), A. rosea (Savigny, 1826), A. trapezoides (Dugesi, 1828), Lumbricus terrestris (Linnaeus, 1758), L. castaneus (Savigny, 1826), Octolasion lacteum (Örley, 1885), Eisenia fetida (Savigny, 1826), and Dendrobaena octaedra (Savigny, 1826). All detected worms are rather unevenly represented in the analysed samples. Background species in the study area are A. caliginosa, A. rosea, and L. terrestris. According to the analysis of the relative abundance in the samples, A. caliginosa is dominant, whereas A. rosea and O. lacteum are less common. According to the results of the spatial distribution of earthworms, a clear dominance of one species was noted in agrocoenoses and in areas with a significant recreational load, whereas in a less anthropogenically transformed zone a higher number and species diversity of lumbricides was noted. Using cluster analysis of k-means according to biodiversity estimates, two clusters of samples were selected. At the same time, such parameters as the number of species, the number of individuals in the sample, and the Brillouin index make the greatest contribution to the differentiation of clusters. A reliable correlation was found between the number of individuals in the sample and the reflectivity in the B8 band range, as well as between the indicator of the evenness of the grouping structure and the reflectivity in the B4, B5, B11, and B12 bands of the Sentinel-2 space image and the value of the NDVI vegetation index. These spectral characteristics were used to model the spatial distribution of the absolute number of lumbricides and the evenness of their groups. The model of the spatial distribution of the number of earthworms has a mosaic character: individual cells with a high number of lumbricides are replaced by areas where they are less abundant. There is a certain relationship between individual estimates of earthworm biodiversity and land cover spectral characteristics.

Key words: Lumbricidae, biodiversity, urbanisation, biotope, remote sensing.

Correspondence to

Oleksandr Harbar; Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University, 40 Velyka Berdychivska Street, Zhytomyr, 10008 Ukraine; Email: o.v.harbar@gmail.com

Article info

Submitted: 21.02.2023. Revised: 21.06.2023. Accepted: 30.06.2023

References

Alvey, A. A. 2006. Promoting and preserving biodiversity in the urban forest. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 5 (4): 195–201.

Bezruchko, L. 2009. Development of recreational digression in Shatskyi National Natural Park territory. Bulletin of Lviv University. Geography series, 36: 23–30. [In Ukrainian]

Galko, O., I. Onyshchuk. 2012. Use of earthworms (Lumbricidae, Oligochaeta) in soil bioindication. Biological research 2012, 45–47. [In Ukrainian]

Caruso, T., M. Migliorini, E. Rota, R. Bargagli. 2017. Highly diverse urban soil communities: Does stochasticity play a major role? Applied Soil Ecology, 110: 73–78.

Congmou, Z., Z. Xiaoling, Z. Mengmeng, H. Shan, G. Muye, [et al.]. 2020. Impacts of urbanization and landscape pattern on habitat quality using OLS and GWR models in Hangzhou, China. Ecological indicators, 117: 106654.

Gilyarov, M. S. 1975. Accounting of large soil invertebrates (mesofauna). Methods of soil and zoological studies, 12–30. [In Russian]

Glasstetter, M. 2016. Earthworm diversity in urban habitats of Basel (Northwestern Switzerland). Zoology in the Middle East, 58 (4): 95–102.

Harbar, O. V., D. A. Harbar, O. V. Pavlushkina. 2014. Earthworms of Novohrad-Volynskyi: the structure of groups depending on the level of ecosystem transformation. Interuniversity scientific and practical conference of students, postgraduates and young scientists “Ecological development of the country within the framework of European integration”. Zhytomyr, 51–52. [In Ukrainian]

Maréchal, J., K. Hoeffner, X. Marié, D. Cluzeau. 2021. Response of earthworm communities to soil engineering and soil isolation in urban landscapes. Ecological engineering, 169: 106307.

McKinney, M. L. 2006. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation, 127 (3): 247–260.

Mezhzherin, S. V., I. Yu. Kotsyuba, E. I. Zhalai, O. V. Harbar. 2010. Genetic structure of populations of the parthenogenetic earthworm Eiseniella tetraedra (Savigny, 1826) in natural and urbanized habitat. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University. Series Biology, 28: 135–138. [In Russian]

Mirzak, O. V. 2002. Ecological features of edaphotopes of urbanized territories of the steppe zone of Ukraine. DNU, Dnipropetrovsk, 1–19. [In Ukrainian]

Misyura, A. N. A. V. Zhukov. 1995. Some aspects of biochemical testing of animals for monitoring the state of the environment. Sustainable development: environmental pollution and environmental safety, 2: 43–44. [In Russian]

Lapied, E., J. Nahmani, G. X. Rousseau. 2009. Influence of texture and amendments on soil properties and earthworm communities. Appl. Soil Ecol., 43: 241–249.

Lavelle, Ch. 1998. Burrowing activity of Aporrectodea rosea. Pedobiologia, 42 (2): 97–101.

Ooms, A., A. T. C. Dias, A. R. van Oosten, J. H. C. Cornelissen, J. Ellers, M. P. Berg. 2020. Species richness and functional diversity of isopod communities vary across an urbanisation gradient, but the direction and strength depend on soil type. Soil biology & biochemistry, 148: 107851.

Pakhomov, A. E., O. N. Kunakh, A. V. Zhukov, Yu. A. Balyuk. 2013. Spatial organization of the ecological niche of the soil mesofauna of the urbozem. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, ecology, 21 (1): 51–57. [In Russian]

Perel, T. S. 1975. Life forms of Lumbricidae. Journal community biol., 36 (2): 189–202. [In Russian]

Perel, T. S. 1979. Distribution and distribution patterns of earthworms in the fauna of the USSR. Nauka, Moscow, 1–272. [In Russian]

Pouyat, R. V., I. D. Yesilonis, M. Dombos, K. Szlavecz, H. Setala, [et al.]. 2015. A global comparison of surface soil characteristics across five cities: A test of the urban ecosystem convergence hypothesis. Soil Science, 180 (4/5): 136–145.

Sternik, V. M., V. Y. Melnyk. 2016. The relevance of earthworm research in the bioindication of the state of urboedaphotopes in the city of Rivne. Collection of scientific works of the Kharkiv National Pedagogical University named after H.S. Frying pans. Biology and valeology, 18: 169–180. [In Ukrainian]

Smetak, K. M., J. L. Johnson-Maynard, J. E. Lloyd. 2007. Earthworm population density and diversity in different-aged urban systems. Applied Soil Ecology, 37 (1–2): 161–168.

Stryganova, B. R. 1980. Food of soil saprophages. Nauka, Moscow, 1–243. [In Russian]

Tóth, Z, K. Szlavecz, D. J. E. Schmidt, E. Hornung, H. Setälä, [et al.]. 2020. Earthworm assemblages in urban habitats across biogeographical regions. Applied Soil Ecology, 151: 103530.

Vlasenko, R., I. Khomiak, O. Harbar, N. Demchuk. 2020. Lumbricides as a bio-indicators of the influence of electrical transmission line in the conditions of Ukrainian Polissia. Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa”, 63 (1): 7–18.

Vsevolodova-Perel, T. S. 1988. Distribution of earthworms in the north of the Palearctic. Biology of Soils of Northern Europe, 84–103. [In Russian]

Xie, T., M. Wang, W. Chen, H. Uwizeyimana. 2018. Impacts of urbanization and landscape patterns on the earthworm communities in residential areas in Beijing. Science of the Total Environment, 626: 1261–1269.

Yeliseeva, L. L., R. P. Vlasenko. 2015. The influence of power lines on the structure of communities of earthworms of the family Lumbricidae from the territory of the Transcarpathian region. Scientific Bulletin of Zhytomyr University. Biology series, 27: 12. [In Ukrainian]

Zhou, D., Yu. Tian. 2018. A spatiotemporal study of the interactive relationship between urbanization and ecosystem services: a practical study of urban agglomeration. China Ind, 95: 152–164.

Zhukov, O. V., A. E. Pakhomov, O. N. Kunakh. 2007. Biological diversity of Ukraine. Dnipropetrovsk region. Earthworms (Lumbricidae). Publishing House of Dnipropetrovsk National University, Dnipropetrovsk, 1–371. [In Ukrainian]