Cite as

Gorobets, L. 2022. Eggshells from archaeological sites in the collection of the National Museum of Natural History NAS of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine). GEO&BIO, 23: 3-14 [English, with Ukrainian summary].

Eggshells from archaeological sites in the collection of the National Museum of Natural History NAS of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine)

doi: https://doi.org/10.53452/gb2303

Leonid Gorobets orcid https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5492-7878

National Museum of Natural History NAS of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine)

pdf:  gb2303-gorobets.pdf

Abstract

Subfossil eggshell finds are useful for many research purposes in various branches of science (zoology, history, archaeology, cultural studies, etc.). Under certain circumstances, eggshells can indicate the season in which the occupation layer formed. Since 2015, zooarchaeological materials from 53 sites have been deposited in the National Museum of Natural History NAS of Ukraine. There were eggshell fragments from 21 sites, at least 288 eggs (3809 fragments). Most of them are excavations of kitchen waste, sometimes graves or natural Holocene taphocoenoses. Accordingly, the eggshell is not a rare zooarchaeological material in sites dated from two thousand years ago and later, but rather common. However, it is difficult to detect in occupation layer without applying special methods (e.g. flotation). Together with the finds of the 20th century, the museum collection contains at least 302 eggs (4084 fragments) dating from Antiquity to the 19th century CE. Most of the finds were found during excavations in Rivne Oblast, Ukraine, in sites dated to the 16th–19th century CE. In most cases, the thickness of the fragments corresponds to the eggs of poultry. Identification is confirmed by the presence of poultry bones in the occupation layers. Shell fragments of chicken (Gallus gallus f. domestica) and goose (Anser anser f. domesticus) eggs can be identified. Measuring shell thickness does not accurately distinguish between remains of duck (Anas platyrhynchos f. domesticus), turkey (Meleagris gallopavo f. domesticus), and large chicken eggs. Eggshells may be indirect evidence of pigeon keeping. Among the wild species, fragments of swan (Cygnus cygnus/Cygnus olor) eggs in the ancient colony of Olbia can be identified. The use of measurements of shell thickness and egg diameter made it possible to identify with a high degree of probability the remains of eggs of the common shelduck (cf. Tadorna tadorna) on the site of an abandoned ancient settlement in the Crimea. A large number of finds suitable for identification indicates that this type of remains is of scientific value and should be stored in the same way as other zooarchaeological materials.

Key word

Eggshell, Holocene, zooarchaeology, poultry, Ukraine.

Correspondence to

Leonid Gorobets; National Museum of Natural History NAS of Ukraine; 15 B. Khmelnytsky Street, Kyiv 01054, Ukraine; Email: ornitologist@gmail.com

Article info

Submitted: 01.12.2022. Accepted: 30.12.2022

References

Albarella, U. 2017. Zooarchaeology in the twenty-first century: where we come from, where we are now, and where we are going. Albarella, U., H. Russ, K. Vickers, S. Viner-Daniels (Eds). The Oxford Handbook of Zooarchaeology. Oxford, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199686476.013.56

Ar, A., H. Rahn, Ch. V. Paganelli. 1979. The avian egg: mass and strength. Condor, 81: 331–337. https://doi.org/10.2307/1366955

Birkhead, M. 1984. Variation in the weight and composition of Mute Swan (Cygnus olor) eggs. The Condor, 86: 489-490. https://doi.org/10.2307/1366838

Driver, J. C. 2011. Identification, Classification and Zooarchaeology. Ethnobiology Letters, 2: 19–39. https://doi.org/10.14237/ebl.2.2011.32

Gopkalo, O., T. Rudych. 2020. Bird eggs from the Chernyakhiv-Sântana de Mureș Culture's graves. City: History, Culture, Society, 11 (4): 91–115.

Gorobets, L., O. Kovalchuk. 2017. Birds in the medieval culture and economy of the East Slavs in the 10–13th centuries AD. Environmental Archaeology, 22 (2): 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/14614103.2016.1141088

Gorobets, L., N. Rudenko. 2021. Remains of birds from the Northwest Black Sea ancient settlements. Environmental Archaeology, 27 (3): 306–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/14614103.2021.1905933

Islam, O., S. Khatun, M. Famous, Md. N. Uddin. 2021. Comparative studies on squab growth performance and egg morphometrical attributes of different pigeon breeds. Animal Husbandry, Dairy and Veterinary Science, 5: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.15761/AHDVS.1000189

Jingjun, W., T. Xiuhua, G. Zhaohong, D. Fenggou, H. Shouhua, [et al.]. 1998. Artificial incubation of Great bustard (Otis tarda) eggs. Journal of Forestry Research, 9: 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02864990

Johnsgard, P. A. 1983. Cranes of the world: demoiselle crane (Anthropoides virgo). In: Johnsgard P. (Ed.). Cranes of the World, 13: 95–102.

Jones, P. J. 1979. Variability of egg size and composition in the great white pelican (Pelecanus onocrotalus). Auk, 96 (2): 407–408.

Kaila, O. P., V. Sankhyan, J. K. Reen, R. K. Vijh, Y. P. Thaku. 2016. Biometry, production potential and genetic characterization of Red Jungle Fowl (Gallus gallus f. dom.) reared under captivity from western Himalayan state of Himachal Pradesh, India. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 51: 406–410. https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.8597

Karabulut, O. 2021. Relationship between weight, volume and specific gravity of goose eggs before incubation. Journal of Advances in VetBio Science and Techniques, 6 (2): 90–99. https://doi.org/10.31797/vetbio.929031

Kerje, S., Ö. Carlborg, L. Jacobsson, K. Schütz, C. Hartmann, P. Jensen, L. Andersson. 2003. The twofold difference in adult size between the red junglefowl and White Leghorn chickens is largely explained by a limited number of QTLs. Animal Genetics, 34: 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2052.2003.01000.x

Lukanov, H. 2019. Domestic quail (Coturnix japonica domestica), is there such farm animal? World's Poultry Science Journal, 75 (4): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933919000631

Rees, E. C., J. M. Black, C. J., Spray, S. Thorisson, 2008. Comparative study of the breeding success of Whooper Swans Cygnus cygnus nesting in upland and lowland regions of Iceland. Ibis, 133: 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1991.tb04584.x

Rhymer, J.M. 1988. The effect of egg size variability on thermoregulation of Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) offspring and its implications for survival. Oecologia, 75: 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378809

Roberts, V. 2008. British Poultry Standards. Hoboken, Wiley-Blackwell, 1–472.

Serjeantson, D. 2009. Birds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–512.

Shatkovska, O.V., M. Ghazali, I.S. Mytiai, N. Druz. 2018. Size and shape correlation of birds’ pelvis and egg: Impact of developmental mode, habitat, and phylogeny. Journal of Morphology, 279 (11): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.20888

Yanish, Ye. Yu. 2016. Archaeozoology — discipline at the interface of sciences. Visnyk Nacionalnoji Academiji Nauk Ukrajiny, 7: 55–68. [In Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2016.07.055