GEO&BIO • 2023, vol. 24, pp. 46–63

https://doi.org/10.53452/gb2405

Cite as

Radzivill, O., V. Grytsenko. 2023. Peculiarities of the socialising role of natural history museums under conditions of transformation of the Ukrainian society. Geo&Bio, 24: 46–63. [In Ukrainian, with English summary]

Peculiarities of the socialising role of natural history museums under conditions of transformation of the Ukrainian society

[Особливості соціалізуючої ролі  природничого музею в умовах трансформації українського суспільства]

Oleksandr Radzivill orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0901-2967

Volodymyr Grytsenko orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2904-4851

National Museum of Natural History, NAS of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine)

pdf:   pdf

Abstract

An overview of the potential role of natural history museums in the socialisation of citizens under conditions of revolutionary worldview changes is presented, the meaning of which in Ukraine is the reinvention and final formation of the political nation and civil society. The unique set of means of information presentation and unobtrusive influence on visitors that a museum can offer for socialisation were analysed in the context of N. Lugman’s vision of society as a complex of cycles of self-reference and autopoiesis, which is realised through interpersonal and public communications. The power of the inertia of interpersonal communication is conclusive, both in the promotion of new ideas and in resistance to their influence. Therefore, reforms of society are impossible without systemic changes at this level, for which language serves as the main mediator. Language is identified as the basis for other ‘communication facilitators’: the means of storing and transmitting information and the ‘generalised exchange mediators’ that are increasingly the product of public communication. Analysing the modern changes that a museum must take into account, both in relations with the audience and in the content of messages, they are considered as a consequence of the finalisation or ‘change of sign’ in various-scale fluctuations of social and cultural dynamics, which embody fluctuations in the confrontation of certain oppositional principles. The most short-term of them in Ukraine turned out to be changes in European integration sentiments and the corresponding actions of the authorities. A fragment of the longest confrontation can be considered the transition of Humanity from the realities of state-caste societies, which are about six thousand years old, to the ideals of civil society, which is just beginning to form. For changes in the field of philosophy, the transition from the narratives of postmodernism to the foundations of metamodernism, which, in particular, includes the ‘new ontology’ of M. Hartman, has become significant. An overview of ideas and narratives that the National Museum of Natural History can share with the audience are offered. At the same time, the content of ideas and narratives is adjusted by the provisions of ontology in the interpretation of N. Hartman, and considerations regarding the possible forms of presenting information are oriented, first of all, to the understanding of the age-related features of its perception by J. Piaget.

Key words: natural history museum, socialisation, self-reference, interpersonal communications, postmodernism, ontology.

Correspondence to

Oleksandr Radzivill; National Museum of Natural History, NAS of Ukraine, 15 Bohdan Khmelnytsky Street, Kyiv, 01054 Ukraine, Email: stishovit@gmail.com

Article info

Submitted: 18.04.2023. Accepted: 30.06.2023.

References

Barkaszi, Z., O. Kovalchuk, A. Maliuk. 2021. Interpretation of evolution as part of science popularization in natural history museums. Geo&Bio21: 13–24. [In Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.15407/gb2104

Berger, P. & Lukman, N. 1995. Social Construction of Reality. Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge. Nauka, Moskva, 1–323. [In Russian]

Chernobay, Yu. 2009. Evolutionary theory in the modern natural history museum (for the 200th anniversary of the birth of Ch. Darwin). In: Natural History Museology (Proceedings of ICOM-Ukraine Conference). Lviv, Kamianets-Podilskyi, 33–41. [In Ukrainian]

Drew, J. 2011. The role of natural history institutions and bioinformatics in conservation biology. Conservation Biology25 (6): 1250–1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01725.x

Farrell, T. 2017Revisiting Postmodernism. RIBA Publishing, Newcastle, 1–224

Hartmann, N. 2003. On the Basis of Ontology. Nauka, St. Petersburg, 1–639. [In Russian]

Karlsen, Ya. 2004. A self-fulfilling prophecy. In: Theory and Methods in Social Sciences. RossPen, Moskva, 102–114. [In Russian]

Lugman, N. 2007. Introduction in System Theory. Logos, Moskva, 1–360. [In Russian]

Maturana, H., F. Varela. 2001. The Tree of Knowledge. Sociological journal, 2: 8–64.

Maturana, H. 1970. Biology of Cognition. BCL Report, 90. Urbana, 1–58.

Mazurik, Z. 2009.Ukrainian National Committee of the International Council of Museums: tasks and prospects. In: Natural History Museology (Proceedings of ICOM-Ukraine Conference). Lviv, Kamianets-Podilskyi, 5–9. [In Ukrainian]

Muraviova, I. 2018. Interactive lessons for preschool children conducted in the State Museum of Nature of Vasyl Karasin Kharkiv National University. Geo&Bio, 16: 110–114. [In Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.15407/gb.2018.16.110

Piazhe, Zh. 2003. Psychology of intelligence. Piter, St. Petersburg, 1–192. [In Russian]

Reale, J., D. Anticery. 2003. Western Philosophy From the East to Our Days. Volume 4. Pnevma, St. Petersburg, 1–880. [In Russian]

Sorokin, P. 2006. A Social and Cultural Dynamics. Astrel, Moskva, 1–1176. [In Russian]

Teilhard de Chardin, P. 1955. The Phenomenon of Men. Harper Perennial Modem Classics, New York, 1–347.

Vaydaher, F. 2005. General Muzeology: Guide. Litopis, Lviv, 1–632. [In Ukrainian]

Zagorodniuk, I. 2019. Conferences and editions of the cycle "Natural HistoryMuseology". Natural History Museology, Volume 5. NMNH of Ukraine, Kyiv, 319–320. [In Ukrainian]