|
GEO&BIO • 2023, vol. 24, pp. 183–213 Cite as Zagorodniuk, I., Z. Barkaszi, O. Protasov, V. Prydatko-Dolin. 2023. The biodiversity concept in crisis? Global tendencies and a view from Ukraine.Geo&Bio, 24: 183–213. [In Ukrainian, with English summary] The biodiversity concept in crisis? Global tendencies and a view from Ukraine [Криза концепції біорізноманіття? Глобальні тенденції та погляд з України] Igor
Zagorodniuk1, Zoltan
Barkaszi1, Oleksandr Protasov2, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0204-2007 Vasyl
Prydatko-Dolin3 1 National Museum of Natural History, NAS of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine); 2 Institute of Hydrobiology, NAS of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine); 3 National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine) pdf: pdf Abstract The concept of biological diversity (BD) emerged in the early 20th century, and since then the term has been widely used in both scientific and popular science, often as a substitute for the concepts of species richness and species diversity. ‘Biodiversity’ has grown into an extensive scientific concept that underpins the theoretical and practical foundations of nature conservation around the world. However, there are many critics of the concept of biodiversity, in particular because of the lack of unambiguous definitions that would simultaneously include the entire scope and all levels and aspects of the diversity of living matter. As a rule, diversity studies focus on such aspects as ‘rarity’, ‘threatened’, and ‘extinction’, which in practical terms is manifested in the attempt to preserve rare and endangered genetic, taxonomic, and ecological units, while the vast majority of living things are left out. So, is the concept of biodiversity in general in a real crisis, or is there only a crisis of diversity of definitions, that is, the theoretical foundations of this concept, particularly in the light of scientific achievements of the 20th and 21st centuries? In this paper, we examine the conceptual positions on biodiversity and the arguments against their paradigmatic nature and general viability, which were brought to public discussion in the article ‘The case against the concept of biodiversity’ by the well-known researcher and journalist Clare Fieseler, published on the well-known American news and explanatory journalism website Vox (2021). From this article, we have identified seven controversial aspects of the current understanding and perception of the concept of biodiversity. The problems associated with the interpretation of the term ‘biodiversity’, biotic diversity as a dynamic system, current trends in biodiversity research, and the contribution of Ukraine to the development of the concept of biodiversity are also discussed. The ideas of pluralism of biodiversity concepts and the possibility of an updated interpretation of this term are considered. The challenges Ukraine faces in times of a great upheaval, in particular in the context of war and catastrophic destruction of natural complexes, are detailed. Key words: biodiversity, biological concepts, taxonomic richness, evenness, conservation biology. Correspondence to Igor Zagorodniuk; National Museum of Natural History, NAS of Ukraine; 15 Bohdan Khmelnytsky Street, Kyiv, 01030 Ukraine; Email: zoozag@ukr.net Article info Submitted: 25.03.2023. Revised: 28.06.2023. Accepted: 30.06.2023 References Allendorf, F. W., W. C. Funk, S. N. Aitken, M. Byrne, G. Luikart. 2022. Conservation and the Genomics of Populations, Third Edition. Oxford University Press, 1–784. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198856566.001.0001 Ashby, W. R. 1957. Requisite variety. An Introduction to Cybernetics. Chapman & Hall Ltd., London, 202–216. Barnosky, A. D., E. A. Hadly, P. Gonzalez, J. Head, P. D. Polly, [et al.]. 2017. Merging paleobiology with conservation biology to guide the future of terrestrial ecosystems. Science, 355 (6325): eaah4787. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah4787 Chapman, A. S., V. Tunnicliffe, A. E. Bates. 2018. Both rare and common species make unique contributions to functional diversity in an ecosystem unaffected by human activities. Diversity and Distributions, 24 (5): 568–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12712 Davydov, D. A. 2021. An update to the species list of vascular plants of the spontaneous flora of the Left Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 78 (1): 23–31. https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj78.01.023 Dietl, G. P., K. W. Flessa. 2011. Conservation paleobiology: putting the dead to work. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 26 (1): 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.09.010 Dietl, G. P., Kidwell, S. M., Brenner, M., Burney, D. A., Flessa, K. W., [et al.]. 2015. Conservation paleobiology: leveraging knowledge of the past to inform conservation and restoration. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 43: 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-040610-133349 Dillon, E. M., J. Q. Pier, J. A. Smith, N. B. Raja, D. Dimitrijević, [et al.]. 2022. What is conservation paleobiology? Tracking 20 years of research and development. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10: 1031483. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.1031483 Emelyanov, I. G. 1999. Diversity and its role in functional stability and evolution of ecosystems. International Solomon's University, Kyiv, 1–168. [In Ukrainian] Fieseler, C. 2021. The case against the concept of biodiversity. Vox, August 5, 2021, online: https://bit.ly/3YY5FIc Gardashuk, T. V. (ed.). 1997. Convention on Biological Diversity: Public Acquaintance and Participation. Cirizen Group ‘Green Ukraine’. Stylos, Kyiv, 1–154. [In Ukrainian] Gardashuk, T. (ed.). 2003. Biodiversity Conservation: Tradition and Modernity. Chemjest, Kyiv, 1–120. [In Ukrainian] Gardashuk, T.2022. Is Russian aggression in Ukraine ecocide? Envigogika, 17 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.642 Hanson, T. 2017. Biodiversity conservation and armed conflict: A warfare ecology perspective. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1429 (1): 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13689 Holubets, M. A. 1997. Film of Life. NAS of Ukraine, Carpathian Ecology Institute. POLLY, Lviv, 1–186. ISBN 966-7307-02-6. [In Ukrainian] Holubets, M. A. 2003. Biological diversity and scientific approaches to its conservation. Liga-Press, Lviv, 1–33. [In Ukrainian] Holubets M. 2008. Biotic and landscape diversities: theory and practice. Ecological Collection. Studies of biotic and Landscape Diversity and Its Conservation. Lviv, 31–47. (Series: Works of the Shevchenko Scientific Society; Vol. 23). [In Ukrainian] IPBES. 2016. The methodological assessment report on scenarios and models of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn, Germany, 1–348. http://bit.ly/3JoZQhi Jagtap, S., H. Trollman, F. Trollman, G. Garcia-Garcia, C. Parra-López, [et al.]. 2022. The Russia-Ukraine Conflict: Its Implications for the Global Food Supply Chains. Foods, 11 (14): 2098. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142098 Jain, M., D. F. Flynn, C. M. Prager, G. M. Hart, C. M. DeVan, [et al.]. 2014. The importance of rare species: A trait‐based assessment of rare species contributions to functional diversity and possible ecosystem function in tall‐grass prairies. Ecology and Evolution, 4 (1): 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.915 Khurshudyan, I., P. Sonne, K. DeYoung. 2023. Ukraine short of skilled troops and munitions as losses, pessimism grow. March13. The Washington Post. Online: https://shorturl.at/bFOQ5 Kotov, M. I. 1923. How the Civil War influenced the distribution of plants and animals in Ukraine and Russia. Znattia, (2): 24–26 [In Ukrainian] Kyseliov, M. M., T. V. Gardashuk, K. E. Zarubitsky, [et al.] 2006. Environmental Dimensions of Globalisation. Monograph. PARAPAN Publishing House, Kyiv, 1–260. [In Ukrainian] Laureto, L. M. O., M. V. Cianciaruso, D. S. M. Samia. 2015. Functional diversity: an overview of its history and applicability. Natureza & Conservação, 13 (2): 112–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncon.2015.11.001 Lawrence, M. J., H. L. J. Stemberger, A. J. Zolderdo, D. P. Struthers, S. J. Cooke. 2015. The effects of modern war and military activities on biodiversity and the environment. Environmental Reviews, 23: 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2015-0039 Le Bagousse-Pinguet, Y., N. Gross, H. Saiz, F. T. Maestre, S. Ruiz, [et al.]. 2021. Functional rarity and evenness are key facets of biodiversity to boost multifunctionality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118 (7): e2019355118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2019355118 Limansky, S. V. 2014. Military actions on the territory of the reserve ‘Cretaceous Flora’. Steppe Bulletin, 42: 34–35. [In Russian] Machlis, G. E., T. Hanson. 2008. Warfare Ecology. BioScience, 58 (8):729–736. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580809 Machlis, G. E., T. Hanson, Z. Špirić, J. E. McKendry (eds).2011. Warfare Ecology. A New Synthesis for Peace and Security. Series: NATO Science for Peace and Security C: Environmental Security. Dordrecht: Springer, I–XIII + 1–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1214-0 Morris, E. K., T. Caruso, F. Buscot, M. Fischer, C. Hancock, [et al.]. 2014. Choosing and using diversity indices: insights for ecological applications from the German Biodiversity Exploratories. Ecology and evolution, 4 (18): 3514–3524. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1155 Peet, R. K. 1975. Relative diversity indices. Ecology, 56 (2): 496–498. https://doi.org/10.2307/1934984 Primack, R. B. 1995. Primer in Conservation Biology. Oxford University Press, 1–384. ISBN 978-0878936236 Protasov, A. A. 2002. Biodiversity and Its Estimation. Conceptual Diversicology. Institute of Hydrobiology, NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv, 1–105. [In Russian] Protasov, A. A. 2011. Life in the Hydrosphere. Essays on General Hydrobiology. Academperiodica, Kyiv, 1–704. [In Russian] Protasov O. O. 2017. Biogeomics. Ecosystems of the World in the Structure of the Biosphere. Akademperiodika, Kyiv, 1–382. [In Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.15407/akademperiodyka.333.382 Prydatko, V. 2000. Biodiversity and bioresources of Ukraine: review of SoE publications (1992-1998) and re-evaluation of trends (1966–1999). The Environment and Resources: scientific problems. Ukrainian Institute of Environmental and Resource Research, Kyiv, 194–215. [In Ukrainian] https://bit.ly/42qEYyO Prydatko V., G. Prystynska, O. Panina, B. Vasylkivskyi. 2006. Assistant in collecting and processing materials for Ukraine’s National Reports on the Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity. UNEP-EcoPravoKyiv, Kyiv, Lviv, 1–48. [In Ukrainian] https://bit.ly/3Ka2ysj Putshkov, P. V. 1992. Uncompensated extinctions in Wurm. 3. Overkill, underkill and other factors. Vestnik zoologii, No. 4: 73–81. [In Russian] Pyron, R. A. 2017. We don’t need to save endangered species. Extinction is part of evolution. The Washington Post, November 22, 2017, online: https://wapo.st/40kcYeH Reimers, N. F. 1990. Nature Management: Dictionary-Reference Book. Mysl, Moskva, 1−637. [In Russian] Rick, T. C., R. Lockwood. 2013. Integrating paleobiology, archeology, and history to inform biological conservation. Conservation Biology, 27 (1): 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01920.x Schimel, J. 2017. Do Species Matter: responding to an op-ed by R. A. Pyron in the Washington Post as a piece of writing. Writing Science. November 30, 2017, online: https://bit.ly/3JpLPQw Sheliag-Sosonko, Y. R., I. G. Emelyanov. 1997. Conceptual foundations of the scientific biodiversity interpretation. In: Gardashuk, T. (ed.). Convention on Biological Diversity: Public Awareness and Participation. Stylos, Kyiv, 11–23. [In Ukrainian] Sheliag-Sosonko, Y. R., D. V. Dubina, L. P. Vakarenko. 2003. Conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity of Ukraine: state and prospects. Chemjest, Kyiv, 1–248. [In Ukrainian] Sheliag-Sosonko, Y. R. 2008. Biodiversity: concept, culture and the role of science. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 65 (1): 3–26. [In Ukrainian] Sheliag-Sosonko Y. R. 2010. The role of biodiversity at the present stage of civilisation. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 67 (1): 3–15. [In Ukrainian] Sozinov, O. O., V. I. Prydatko (eds). 2005. Agrobiodiversity of Ukraine: Theory, Methodology, Indicators, Examples. Book 1. ‘Nichlava’, Kyiv, 1–374. [In Ukrainian] Sozinov, O. O., V. I. Prydatko, R. I. Burda, O. G. Tararico, O. O. Kucher. 2005. About the most important indicators, quantitative and qualitative properties of the mega-agroecosystem (agrosphere) of Ukraine. Agrobiodiversity of Ukraine: Theory, Methodology, Indicators, Examples. ‘Nichlava’, Kyiv, 2: 17–30. [In Ukrainian] http://www.ulrmc.org.ua/services/binu/publications/BINU_book_1.pdf Stantschinsky, V. 1931 a. On some basic concepts of zoology in the light of modern ecology. Proceedings of the Fourth All-Union Congress of Zoologists, Anatomists and Histologists (Kyiv, May 6–12, 1930). Gosmedizdat of the Ukrainian SSR, Kyiv, Kharkiv, 42–43. [In Russian] Stantschinsky, W. W. 1931 b. Zur Frage der Bedeutung der Masse der Artensubstanz für das dynamische Gleichgewicht der Biocönosen. The Journal of Ecology and Biocenology (Moscow, Leningrad), 1 (1): 88–95. [In Russian and Germany] Sytnyk, K. M. 1994. Environmental crisis: assessment, development, possible consequences. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 51 (6): 3–17. [In Ukrainian] Sytnyk, K. M. 1997. Sustainable development of society and biological biodiversity. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 54 (4): 317–323. [In Ukrainian] Sytnyk, K. M. 2011. Problems of global phytodiversity and development of phytodiversitology. Ecology and noospherology, 22 (3-4): 6–18. [In Ukrainian] https://shorturl.at/chERW Sytnyk, K. M. 2012. Biotic diversity: current situation, close and distant outlooks of its conservation, elimination and enrichment. Ecological Sciences: a scientific and practical journal, № 1: 26–32. [In Ukrainian] https://shorturl.at/lmBIW The Global ... 2022. The Global Report on Food Crises 2022 | in brief. FSIN. Website. https://shorturl.at/beyFK Tilman, D. 2001. Functional diversity. Encyclopedia of biodiversity, 3 (1): 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-226865-2/00132-2 Tredici, P. D. 2010. Spontaneous urban vegetation: reflections of change in a globalized world. Nature and Culture, 5 (3): 299–315. http://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2010.050305 Violle, C., W. Thuiller, N. Mouquet, F. Munoz, N. J. Kraft, [et al.]. 2017. Functional rarity: the ecology of outliers. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 32 (5): 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.02.002 Walter, H. 1982. General Geobotany. Translation from German. Mir, Moskva, 1–264. [In Russian] Whittaker, R. H. 1975. Communities and Ecosystems. Second edition. MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York, 1–387. Wilson, E. O. 1985. The biological diversity crisis. BioScience, 35 (11): 700–706. https://doi.org/10.2307/1310051 Wilson, E. O. 1994. Naturalist, Shearwater Books Island Press, 1–380. ISBN 1-55963-288-7 Wilson, E. O., L. S. Southworth. 1996. In Search of Nature, Shearwater Books, 1–224. ISBN 1-55963-215-1 World ... 2022. World Economic Outlook Report October 2022. IMF. Website. https://shorturl.at/hltL2 Zagorodniuk, I. 1997. Concept of ‘hot territories’ and biodiversity protection. In: T. Gardashuk (ed.). Convention on Biological Diversity: Public Awareness and Participation. Stylos, Kyiv, 59–68+146–147. [In Ukrainian] Zagorodniuk, I. 2004. Fundamentals of diversitology(schedules of lectures for specializations “Ecology”). Uzhhorod University Press, Uzhhorod, 1–20. [In Ukrainian] http://lucanus.org.ua/progr/dyversykologia.pdf Zagorodniuk I. (ed.). 2012. Dynamics of Biodiversity 2012 (Collection of scientific articles). Taras Shevchenko Luhansk University Press, Luhansk, 1–252. ISBN 978-966-617-297-9. [In Ukrainian] https://shorturl.at/dqEX8 Zagorodniuk, I. 2013. Artificial econets and biological invasions: essence, relations, role in biota changes. In: Modern Ecological Problems and Their Decision (Proceed. III Intern. Conf.). Luhansk, 40–43. [In Ukrainian] Zagorodniuk, I. 2021. On species, its reality and types of species. Geo&Bio, 20: 34–49. [In Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.15407/gb2006 Zagorodniuk, I., S. Kharchuk. 2022. Spontaneous mammal fauna of Ukraine: concept, composition, features. Novitates Theriologicae, 13: 5–19. [In Ukrainian] http://doi.org/10.53452/nt1311 Zagorodniuk, I., D. Vyshnevsky. 2022. Biodiversity losses and changes in the zones of prolonged hostilities in Ukraine: theriological component (2014–2022). Visnyk NAS of Ukraine, No. 11: 60–78. https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2022.11.060 |
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0523-133X