GEO&BIO • 2023, vol. 24, pp. 225–236

https://doi.org/10.53452/gb2415

Cite as

Tytar, V. 2023. Climatic limits for the present European distribution of the common hornbeam (Carpinus betulus), with special reference to Ukraine. Geo&Bio, 24: 225–236. [In English, with Ukrainian summary]

Climatic limits for the present European distribution of the common hornbeam (Carpinus betulus), with special reference to Ukraine

Volodymyr Tytar orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0864-2548

I. I. Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology, NAS of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine)

pdf:   pdf

Abstract

In this study, we used a comprehensive approach to detect the importance of diverse climatic parameters in controling the distribution of a forest tree species, exemplified by the common hornbeam (Carpinus betulus L.). Special reference has been made to Ukraine from where digitized data on the species is relatively scarce. In Ukraine, populations of the common hornbeam are found at the edge of its geographic range, primarily in forest-steppe ecotones, which are exposed to extreme climate with water shortages during the growing season and low temperatures in winter. Usually forests in these ecotones are highly fragmented and, in addition to climate impact, are heavily subjected to land use. Currently, in the east of the country, C. betulus is only very locally distributed, but it has been assumed that in the past there were several areas suitable for the persistence of the species. The main objectives of the present study were to model the European-wide ecological niche of the common hornbeam and investigate primary climatic factors that control the potential distribution of this tree in Ukraine. Using an ecological niche modelling approach, we consider to have reliably modeled the European-wide bioclimatic niche of the common hornbeam for predicting the response of species’ geographical distribution to climate. Most contributing to the model were the mean monthly PET (potential evapotranspiration) of the coldest quarter, continentality, and annual PET. In terms of the ‘Most Limiting Factor,’ in Ukraine, continentality is crucial throughout the majority of the country (78%). Because the distribution of any species depends on variables related to climate, it is likely that the species could rapidly respond to climatic change. In this respect, the common hornbeam is no exception, as exemplified by the history of the species in Eastern Europe. Limiting factors and thresholds (particularly of PET indices) are bound to shift together with global climate change and bring in changes to the pattern of the common hornbeam distribution, especially at edges of its geographic range.

Key words: Carpinus betulus; species distribution modelling; ecological niche; Ukraine, Maxent.

Correspondence to

Volodymyr Tytar; I. I. Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology, NAS of Ulraine; 15 Bohdan Khmelnytsky Street, Kyiv, 01054 Ukraine; Email: vtytar@gmail.com; orcid: 0000-0002-0864-2548

Article info

Submitted: 10.05.2023. Revised: 19.05.2023. Accepted: 30.06.2023.

References

Akaike, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19 (6): 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705

Augustaitis, A., A. Kliučius, V. Marozas, [et al.]. 2015. Sensitivity of European beech trees to unfavorable environmental factors on the edge and outside of their distribution range in north-eastern Europe. iForest, 9: 259–269. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1398-008

Austin, M. P. 2002. Spatial prediction of species distribution: An interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecological Modelling, 157 (2-3): 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00205-3

Austin, M. P., K. P. Van Niel. 2011. Impact of landscape predictors on climate change modelling of species distributions: a case study with Eucalyptus fastigata in southern New South Wales, Australia. Journal of Biogeography, 38 (1): 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02415.x

Bagni, N., G. Marino, P. Torrigiani, [et al.]. 1977. Levels and aggregation of ribosomes during dormancy and dormancy break of peach flower buds. Physiologica Plantarum, 39 (2): 165–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1977.tb04029.x

Baldwin, R. A. 2009. Use of maximum entropy modeling in wildlife research. Entropy,11 (4): 854–866. https://doi.org/10.3390/e11040854

Beck, J., L. Ballesteros-Mejia, P. Nagel, [et al.]. 2013. Online solutions and the ‘Wallacean shortfall’: What does GBIF contribute to our knowledge of species’ ranges? Diversity and Distributions, 19 (8): 1043–1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12083

Bradie, J., B. Leung. 2017. A quantitative synthesis of the importance of variables used in MaxEnt species distribution models. Journal of Biogeography, 44: 1344–1361. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12894

Carpinus betulus L. in GBIF Secretariat (2017). GBIF Backbone Taxonomy. Checklist Dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/39omei

Clark, J., Y. Wang, P. V. August. 2014. Assessing current and projected suitable habitats for tree-of-heaven along the Appalachian Trail. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369 (1643): 20130192. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0192

Conrad, O., B. Bechtel, M. Bock et al. 2015. System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4. Geoscientific Model Development, 8: 1991-2007. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1991-2015

Cordova, C. 2016. Crimea and the Black Sea: An Environmental History. London, New York, I. B. Tauris, 1–235.

Currie, D.J. 1991. Energy and large-scale patterns of animal-species and plant-species richness. American Naturalist, 137 (1): 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1086/285144

Desprez-Loustau, M.-L., B. Marcais, L.-M. Nageleisen, [et al.]. 2006. Interactive effects of drought and pathogens in forest trees. Annals of Forest Science, 63 (6): 597–612. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2006040

Didukh, J. P. 1992. Vegetation cover of the mountainous Crimea. K.: Naukova dumka, 1-250. [In Russian]

Elith, J., S. J. Phillips, T. Hastie, [et al.]. 2011. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions, 11 (1): 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x

Ellison, A. M., M. S. Bank, B. D. Clinton et al. 2005. Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3 (9): 479–486. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0479:LOFSCF]2.0.CO;2

European Commission. 2013. Interpretation Manual of European Union Habitats, version EUR 28. Nature and Biodiversity Directorate-General for the Environment, Brussels. https://eunis.eea.europa.eu/references/2435

Fedorova, R. V. 1951. On the question of the distribution of hornbeam in the post-glacial period on the territory of the European part of the USSR. Problems of physical geography, 16: 163–165. [In Russian]

Fielding, A. H., J. F. Bell. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation,24 (1): 38–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0376892997000088

Fisher, J.B., R. J. Whittaker, Y. Malhi. 2011. ET come home: potential evapotranspiration in geographical ecology. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00578.x

Franklin, J., K. E. Wejnert, S. A. Hathaway et al. 2009. Effect of species rarity on the accuracy of species distribution models for reptiles and amphibians in southern California. Diversity and Distributions, 15 (1): 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00536.x

Gray, L.K., A. Hamann. 2013. Tracking suitable habitat for tree populations under climate change in western North America. Climate Change, 117 (1-2): 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0548-8

Guisan, A., W. Thuiller. 2005. Predicting species distribution: Offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters, 8 (9): 993–1009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x

Hageer, Y., M. Esperón-Rodríguez, J. B. Baumgartner et al. 2017. Climate, soil or both? Which variables are better predictors of the distributions of Australian shrub species? PeerJ, 5: e3446. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3446

Hänninen, H. 1991. Does climatic warming increase the risk of frost damage in northern trees? Plant Cell and Environment, 14 (5): 449-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01514.x

Hawkins, B. A., R. Field, H. V. Cornell, et al. 2003. Energy, water, and broad-scale geographic patterns of species richness. Ecology, 84 (12): 3105–3117. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-8006

Hijmans, R. J., L. Guarino, M. Cruz, [et al.]. 2001. Computer tools for spatial analysis of plant genetic resources data: 1. DIVA-GIS. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter, No. 127: 15–19.

Holdridge, L. R. 1947. Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic data. Science, 105 (2727): 367–368. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.105.2727.367

Huntley, B., P. M. Berry, W. Cramer, [et al.]. 1995. Modelling present and potential future ranges of some European higher plants using climate response surfaces. Journal of Biogeography, 22 (6): 967–1001. https://doi.org/10.2307/2845830

Hutchinson, A.H. 1918. Limiting factors in relation to specific ranges of tolerance of forest trees. Botanical Gazette, 66 (6): 465–493. https://doi.org/10.1086/332372

Jueterbock, A., L. Smolina, J. A. Coyer, et al. 2016. The fate of the Arctic seaweed Fucus distichus under climate change: an ecological niche modelling approach. Ecology and Evolution, 6 (6): 1712–1724. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2001

Kira, T. 1976. Terrestrial ecosystem—a general survey. Kyoritsu Shuppan, Tokyo, 1–166.

Köppen, W. 1936. Das geographische System der Klimate. Handbuch der Klimatologie (Ed. by W. Köppen and R. Geiger), 1 ( part C), 1–44. Source: http://koeppen-geiger.vu-wien.ac.at/pdf/Koppen_1936.pdf

Kriticos, D. J., B. L. Webber, A. Leriche, [et al.]. 2012. CliMond: global high resolution historical and future scenario climate surfaces for bioclimatic modelling. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3 (1): 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00134.x

Laurent, J.-M., A. Bar-Hen, L. François, [et al.]. 2004. Refining vegetation simulation models: from plant functional types to bioclimatic affinity groups of plants. Journal of Vegetation Science, 15 (6): 739–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02316.x

Lavrinenko, D. D. 1972. Interaction of Wood Species in Different Types of Forests. Volume 70, issue 57224. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, and the National Science Foundation, 1–331. (Series: United States. National Technical Information Service).

Loehle, C., D. LeBlanc. 1996. Model-based assessments of climate change effects on forests: A critical review. Ecological Modelling, 90 (1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(96)83709-4

MacDicken, K., Ö. Jonsson, L. Piña, et al. 2015. "Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015" (PDF): fao.org. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 October 2015. ISBN 9781370433124.

Mala, Yu. I. 2012. Hornbeam forests at the southern limit of distribution. Black Sea Botanical Journal, 8 (3): 265–283. [In Ukrainian]

Mauri, A., G. Strona, J. San-Miguel-Ayanz. 2017. EU-Forest, a high-resolution tree occurrence dataset for Europe. Scientific Data, 4: 160123. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.123

Nix, H. A. 1986. A biogeographic analysis of Australian Elapid Snakes. In: R. Longmore (ed.). Atlas of Elapid Snakes of Australia, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Sydney, Australia, 4–15. (Series: Australian Flora and Fauna; Number 7).

O’Brien, E. M. 2006. Biological relativity to water–energy dynamics. Journal of Biogeography, 33 (11): 1868–1888. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01534.x

Phillips, S. J., R. P. Anderson, R. E. Schapire. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, 190 (3): 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026

Pokorný, P. 2005. Role of man in the development of Holocene vegetation in Central Bohemia. Preslia, 77 (1): 113–128.

Prentice, I. C., W. Cramer, S. P. Harrison, [et al.]. 1992. A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate. Journal of Biogeography, 19 (2): 117–134. https://doi.org/10.2307/2845499

Raffa, K. F., B. H. Aukema, B. J. Bentz, [et al.]. 2008. Cross-scale drivers of natural disturbances prone to anthropogenic amplification: the dynamics of bark beetle eruptions. Bioscience, 58 (6): 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580607

Saure, M. C. 1985. Dormancy release in deciduous fruit trees. Horticultural Reviews, 7: 239–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118060735.ch6

Simonov, D. O., Y. P. Didukh. 2001. Climatic and chorological analysis of representatives of the tree flora of Ukraine. Scientific notes NaUKMA, 19 (2): 405–406. [In Ukrainian]

Sun, G., J.-C. Domec, D. M. Amatya. 2016. Forest evapotranspiration: measurements and modeling at multiple scales. In: Amatya et al. (eds.), Forest Hydrology: Processes, Management and Assessment. CABI Publishers, U.K., 32-50.

Swets, J. 1988. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240 (4857): 1285–1293. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3287615

Sykes, M. T., I. C. Prentice, R. W. Cramer. 1996. A bioclimatic model for the potential distributions of north European tree species under present and future climates. Journal of Biogeography, 23 (2): 203–233. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2845812.

Thornthwaite, C. W. 1948. An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geographical Review, 38 (1): 57–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/210739

Title, P. O., J. B. Bemmels. 2018. ENVIREM: an expanded set of bioclimatic and topographic variables increases flexibility and improves performance of ecological niche modeling. Ecography, 41 (2): 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1101/075200

Tonkov, S., E. Marinova, M. Filipova-Marinova, et al. 2013. Holocene palaeoecology and human–environmental interactions at the coastal Black Sea Lake Durankulak, northeastern Bulgaria. Quaternary International, 328 (1): 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2013.12.004

Udra, I. K. 1988. Dispersion of plants and issues of paleo- and biogeography. Naukova Dumka, Kyiv, 1–200. [In Russian]

Udra, I. K. 2010. Reasons for the reduction of the range of common hornbeam (Carpinus betulus L.) and its migratory possibilities of restoration of lost territories. Bulletin of the National Museum of Natural Sciences, 8: 111–128. [In Ukrainian]

Verbruggen, H., L. Tyberghein, G. S. Belton et al. 2013. Improving transferability of introduced species’ distribution models: new tools to forecast the spread of a highly invasive seaweed. PLoS One, 8: e68337. https://doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0068337

Vorobyov, E. O., V. M. Lyubchenko, V. A. Solomakha, et al. 2008. Classification of hornbeam forests of Ukraine. Phytosociotsentr, Kyiv, 1–252. [In Ukrainian] ISBN: 978-966-306-147-6

Waltari, E., R. P. Guralnick. 2009. Ecological niche modeling of montane mammals in the Great Basin, North America: examining past and present connectivity of species across basins and ranges. Journal of Biogeography, 36 (1): 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01959.x

Warren, D. L., R. E. Glor, M. Turelli. 2010. ENM Tools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. Ecography, 33 (3): 607–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06142.x

Woodward, F. I. 1987. Climate and Plant Distribution. Cambridge University Press, 1–174. ISBN 0521237661.

Woodward, F. I., L. Rochefort. 1991. Sensitivity analysis of vegetation diversity to environmental change. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, 1 (1): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/2997540