Review of the spatial distribution of kimberlite pipes in the tectonic structures of the world[Огляд просторового розподілу кімберлітових трубок по тектонічних структурах світу]Andrii Luniachek https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9428-6551 V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (Kharkiv, Ukraine) Cite as Luniachek, A. 2025. Review of the spatial distribution of kimberlite pipes in the tectonic structures of the world. GEO&BIO, 27: 101-114. (In Ukrainian, with English summary). doi: https://doi.org/10.53452/gb2708 pdf: gb2708_101-114-lun-fin.pdf Abstract Kimberlite pipes are vertical or inclined cylindrical or cone-shaped bodies filled with kimberlite, an ultramafic igneous rock. The diameter of kimberlite pipes can vary from a few metres to 1.5 km, and their depth reaches several kilometres. The geological significance of kimberlite pipes is that they are the main source of diamonds and may contain other minerals: gold, platinum, ilmenite, rutile, and chromite. In addition, kimberlites provide valuable information about the composition and structure of the Earth’s mantle, as well as about deep magmatic processes. The article researches the spatial distribution of kimberlite pipes in the tectonic structures of the world. Kimberlite pipes can be found on all continents. Their location is uneven, with a fuzzy concentration in certain geographical regions. The main regions where kimberlite pipes are concentrated are South Africa, Yakutia, Canada, and Australia. In addition, kimberlite pipes have also been found in South America, West Africa, Northern Europe, India, and China. It has been shown that kimberlite pipes are located exclusively on continents within ancient platforms (cratons) with basement of Archean and Early Proterozoic age. Most of the pipes are located on basement elevations—shields, anteclises, and near rift zones. There are no kimberlite pipes in the oceans. The age of the pipes and the age of their host rocks do not correlate with each other. The age of the host rocks is Archean or Paleoproterozoic (3500 to 1600 Ma), while the age of kimberlite pipes varies in a wide range, from the Neoarchean to the Eocene (2800 to 45 Ma). In most diamond-bearing regions, there are kimberlite pipes located relatively close to each other, but with significantly different ages (for example, the Slave craton, the pipes of the Dayavik and Snap Lake deposits—55 and 535 Ma, respectively, with a distance of 100 km between them). Understanding the patterns of spatial distribution of kimberlite pipes should help to identify perspective areas for the exploration of new pipes, which may lead to the discovery of new diamond deposits. Key words kimberlite pipes, tectonic structures, diamonds, cratons, shields, platforms, rift zones. Correspondence to Andrii Luniachek; V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Square, 61022 Kharkiv, Ukraine; Email: serval185@gmail.com; orcid: 0009-0008-9428-6551 Article info Submitted: 17.02.2025. Revised: 10.04.2025. Accepted: 30.06.2025 Apen, F., R. Rudnick, D. Ionov, J. Cottle, J. Moyen, A. Golovin, A. Korsakov. 2022. Heat transfer and production in cratonic continental crust: U‐Pb thermochronology of xenoliths from the Siberian Craton. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 23 (10): e2022GC010497. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GC010497 Chalapathi Rao, N. V., A. Dongre, F.-Y. Wu, B. Lehmann. 2016. A Late Cretaceous (ca. 90 Ma) kimberlite event in southern India: Implication for sub-continental lithospheric mantle evolution and diamond exploration. Gondwana Research, 35: 378–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2015.06.006 Clifford, T. N. 1966. Tectono-metallogenic units and metallogenic provinces of Africa. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1: 421–434. Cordani, U. G., W. Teixeira, M. S. D'Agrella-Filho, R. I. Trindade. 2009. The position of the Amazonian Craton in supercontinents. Gondwana Research, 15: 396–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2008.12.005 Davis, W. J., A. G. Jones, W. Bleeker, H. Grütter. 2003. Lithosphere development in the Slave craton: a linked crustal and mantle perspective. Lithos, 71: 575–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-4937(03)00131-2 Geiko, Y. V., V. S. Metalidi, L. I. Lykov, V. L. Prykhodko. 2004. The state and prospects of geological exploration for diamonds in the Right-Bank Ukraine. In: Gurskyi,D. S. (ed.). Problems of diamond content of the territory of Ukraine. Kyiv, 7–18. [In Ukrainian] Girnis, A., I. Ryabchikov. 2005. Generation of kimberlite magmas: Conditions and mechanisms. Geology of Ore Deposits, 47: 524–536. Grabreck, A., N. Flament, Ö. F. Bodur. 2022. Mapping global kimberlite potential from reconstructions of mantle flow over the past billion years. PLoS One, 17: e0268066. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268066 Helmstaedt, H., J. Gurney, S. Richardson. 2011. Ages of cratonic diamond and lithosphere evolution: Constraints on precambrian tectonics and diamond exploration. The Canadian Mineralogist, 48: 1385–1408. https://doi.org/10.3749/canmin.48.5.1385 Iizuka, T., T. Komiya, Y. Ueno, I. Katayama, Y. Uehara, S. Maruyama, T. Hirata, S.P. Johnson, D.J. Dunkley. 2007. Geology and zircon geochronology of the Acasta Gneiss Complex, northwestern Canada: New constraints on its tectonothermal history. Precambrian Research, 153: 179–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2006.11.017 Janse, A. J. A. 1994.Is Clifford’s Rule still valid? Affirmative examples from around the World. Proceedings of the Fifth International Kimberlite Conference, Araxa, Brazil 1991, 2: 215–235. Janse, A. J. A., P. A. Sheahan 1995. Catalogue of world-wide diamond and kimberlite occurrences: a selective and annotative approach. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 53: 73–111. Kamenetsky, V. S., A. V. Golovin, R. Maas, A. Giuliani, M. B. Kamenetsky, Y. Weiss. 2014. Towards a new model for kimberlite petrogenesis: Evidence from unaltered kimberlites and mantle minerals. Earth-Science Reviews, 139: 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.09.004 Kaminsky, F. V., O. D. Zakharchenko, W. L. Griffin, D. M. Channer, G. K. Khachatryan-Blinova. 2000. Diamond from the Guaniamo area, Venezuela. The Canadian Mineralogist, 38: 1347–1370. https://doi.org/10.2113/gscanmin.38.6.1347 Kaminsky, F. V., S. M. Sablukov, E. A. Belousova, P. Andreazza, M. Tremblay, W. L. Griffin. 2010. Kimberlitic sources of super-deep diamonds in the Juina area, Mato Grosso State, Brazil. Lithos, 114: 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2009.07.012 Kjarsgaard, B. A. 2007. Kimberlite pipe models: significance for exploration. Proceedings of the Fifth Decennial International Conference on Mineral Exploration (Toronto, 9–12 September 2007). Toronto, 667–677. Kjarsgaard, B., M. Wit, L. Heaman, G. Pearson, J. Stiefenhofer, N. Janusczcak, S. Shirey. 2022. A review of the geology of global diamond mines and deposits. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 88: 1–117. https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2022.88.01 Kroonenberg, S., E. de Roever. 2010. Geological evolution of the Amazonian Craton. In: Hoorn, C., F. P. Wesselingh (Eds.). Amazonia, Landscape and Species Evolution: A Look into the Past. Hoboken, 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444306408.ch2 Leveille, P., M. Sepehri, D. B. Apel. 2017. Rockbursting potential of kimberlite: a case study of Diavik Diamond Mine. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 50: 3223–3231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1294-z Mahmoud, H. O., M. Raji, M. Adjour, I. B. Vall. 2023. Mineralization and exploration perspectives in the Oudiane Elkharoub Zone, Birimian Domain, Reguibat Shield, Mauritania. Open Journal of Geology, 13: 1312–1330. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2023.1312057 Michaud, M. 2005. An overview of diamond exploration in the North China Craton. Mineral Deposit Research: Meeting the Global Challenge, 1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27946-6_394 Mitchell, R., A. Giuliani, H. O'Brien. 2019. What is a kimberlite? Petrology and Mineralogy of Hypabyssal Kimberlites. Elements, 15: 381–386. https://doi.org/10.2138/gselements.15.6.381 Mukherjee, A., P. Tiwari, C. B. Verma, E. V. S. S. K. Babu, J. P. Sarathi. 2021. Native gold and Au-Pt alloy in eclogite xenoliths of Kalyandurg KL-2 Kimberlite, Anantapur District, South India. Journal of Geological Society of India, 97: 567–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-021-1731-1 Myers, J., R. Shaw, I. Tyler. 1996. Tectonic evolution of Proterozoic Australia. Tectonics, 15: 1431–1446. https://doi.org/10.1029/96TC02356 Nkere, B. J., W. L. Griffin, P. E. Janney. 2019. Emplacement age of the Tshibwe kimberlite, Democratic Republic of Congo, by in-situ LAM-ICPMS U/Pb dating of groundmass perovskite. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 157, 103502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2019.05.010 Osei, K. P., C. L. Kirkland, D. R. Mole. 2021. Nd and Hf isoscapes of the Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia and implications for its mineral systems. Gondwana Research, 92: 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2020.12.027 Percival, J., T. Skulski, M. Sanborn-Barrie, G. Stott, A. D. Leclair, M. T. Corkery, M. Boily. 2012. Geology and tectonic evolution of the Superior Province, Canada. Geological Association of Canada Special Paper, 49: 321–378. Ruzina, M. V., O. A. Tereshkova, N. V. Bilan, I. V. Zhyltsova. 2018. Non-kimberlitic sources of diamonds and prospects of their discovery in the Ukrainian Shield. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 6: 5–12. https://doi.org/10.29202/nvngu/2018-6/2 Sarkar, S., A. Giuliani, H. Dalton, D. Phillips, S. Ghosh, S. Misev, R. Maas. 2023. Derivation of lamproites and kimberlites from a common evolving source in the convective mantle: the case for Southern African 'Transitional Kimberlites'. Journal of Petrology, 64: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egad043 Shellnutt, J., T. Lee, C. Yang, S. Hu, J. Wu, K. Wang, C. Lo. 2015. Late Permian mafic rocks identified within the Doba basin of southern Chad and their relationship to the boundary of the Saharan Metacraton. Geological Magazine, 152: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756815000217 Shigley, J. E., R. Shor, P. Padua, C. M. Breeding, S. B. Shirey, D. Ashbury. 2016. Mining diamonds in the Canadian Arctic: the Diavik Mine. Gems & Gemology, 52: 104–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.5741/GEMS.52.2.104 Smit, K. V., R. Shor. 2017. Geology and development of the Lomonosov diamond deposit, Northwestern Russia. Gems and Gemology, 53: 144–167. https://doi.org/10.5741/GEMS.53.2.144 Stiefenhofer, J., D. J. Farrow. 2004. Geology of the Mwadui kimberlite, Shinyanga district, Tanzania. Lithos, 76: 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2004.04.017 Torsvik, T., K. Burke, B. Steinberger, S. J. Webb, L. D. Ashwal. 2010. Diamonds sampled by plumes from the core–mantle boundary. Nature, 466: 352–355. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09216 Whitmeyer S.J., K. E. Karlstrom. 2007. Tectonic model for the Proterozoic growth of North America. Geosphere, 3: 220–259. https://doi.org/10.1130/GES00055.1 Woodhead, J., J. Hergt, A. Giuliani, R. Maas, D. Phillips, D. G. Pearson, G. Nowell. 2019. Kimberlites reveal 2.5-billion-year evolution of a deep, isolated mantle reservoir. Nature, 573: 578–581. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1574-8 |